A question about welcoming difficult feelings arises, leading to a discussion on the difference between true acceptance and strategic tolerance, and how genuine openness transforms one's relationship to frustration, anger, and vulnerability.
A question about welcoming difficult feelings arises, leading to a discussion on the difference between true acceptance and strategic tolerance, and how genuine openness transforms one's relationship to frustration, anger, and vulnerability.
Consider this: if what you're experiencing were never to go away, and you had to be with it for the rest of your life. If you knew for certain it would never get fixed, that it's just going to be like this forever and you can't change it. Can you be with it now, knowing that? That's a welcoming. It's not wanting it.
That makes it worse for me. That makes me hate it more.
Yes, but try it, because it activates your resistance. The hating it more is actually useful. It's bringing up the true resistance. It's showing you there's a bat hidden behind your back.
It's the opposite of "this too shall pass," which can itself be a way to push things away.
Exactly. Just assume this is never going to go away. This is how you're going to feel for the rest of your life. If that's the case, can you make friends with it? Can you be with it? When you take on that framework, a big "no" comes up. That's the point. It's bringing up the true resistance.
But the point is to feel it, not just to think about it, right? It's a way to open the door to that feeling.
Welcoming versus strategy
Yes, to be with it. But if your approach becomes, "Well, if I do it this way, it's actually going to go away," then no. That's the bat again. If it's a strategy to fix it or get rid of it, it's not a true welcoming, not a true openness to it.
What happens is that at some point you simply arrive at, "I'm totally fine if this is how I feel for the rest of my life. If this is the condition, the situation, the experience, I'm totally fine with that." And that is often when it goes away. When the being-fine-with-it is very true, very real, and authentic.
Is it that you get tougher? Is that what's happening?
The paradox of vulnerability
No. You get more vulnerable, more open. It appears tough to others. It appears strong and powerful from the outside, but subjectively it's not like that at all.
My partner saw a very big change, almost overnight. She was amazed. And for me, I don't know if I have words for it. It's not what it appears. It's very gentle, open, vulnerable. Before, I would have the tiniest issue and I'd be kicking and screaming. Now my body could be literally falling apart and I'm fine. In fact, I've had to learn the reverse: to go slower, to be gentle, to honor the body's tempo, to take more appropriate rest.
Before, if I didn't rest, I was a mess. Now I can go without sleeping and feel fine. I could work overnight. There are 180 steps down to the beach here, and I could run up them until my body is breaking. But I've learned not to.
Before, I was tough in certain ways. If I committed to push, I could push and not complain. But the things I wanted to be a certain way? Kicking and screaming. Daily. Multiple times a day. It was practically my favorite hobby, and my partner was the victim of it.
Then it slowed down, and one day it just stopped. I even forgot it had ever been that way. She would remind me, and it was like a distant memory from somebody else's life. Now I have to learn to complain, to practice saying no to some things, to some people. I have very healthy boundaries, but I do have to adjust in the other direction.
You don't feel triggered or taken advantage of, or any of the usual reactions?
Working with frustration skillfully
When things get really bad, I do experience something like frustration, but it's very mild. I used to have such intense reactions to work situations. That was my second hell. The first was relationship issues; the second was work. Now I have to be careful and pay attention, because sometimes it's wise to get a bit frustrated, to express it. I have to act it out a little. It's almost like a poker move. I'm playing the business game, and sometimes I have to bluff frustration so the message lands.
I was just talking about this last night. I remember a teacher describing the same thing: having to act out anger even without feeling it, so that people would listen. He would have an explosion of anger to send a message, but he wasn't really angry. Which is actually realizing that you are playing a character.
One hundred percent. That's exactly how it is. And it's the same principle I was describing earlier about decisions. You don't know if it's right or wrong, but it feels appropriate to communicate something with anger, even though you're not actually angry. You're invoking a way of expression. Especially in business, that's sometimes the language needed.
It's also happened in relationships, with my mother, in a few situations where I felt it was important to express anger. There was a family situation a few months ago. I was asked to get involved, and I did. Then the person who asked me regretted it, because they didn't really want the truth. They could feel I might do something helpful, and I think it was a correct intuition. But they didn't want what came with it.
It helped the situation, but it required people hearing things they didn't want to hear. For me, if you open the door, if you ask the question, I'll answer honestly. At most, I can ask you to rate from one to ten how direct you want me to be. If you say five, I can soften the blow. But if I feel the ask is sincere, I'm going to tell you the truth.
I said some very difficult things. The person in front of me was going through their trauma and breaking down within two minutes. Then the family had to manage that person's process for weeks afterward. But the door was opened, and the truth was what came through it.